And i am afraid that i am still resentful of Michels attitude about the core 
members who were being attacked and his decision to fall silent to the 
attackers to ensure that they would leave his "core' members alone.,  A 
situation made worse by his repost to a FALSE secrecy whereby the core members 
could not be identified absent a pledge not to reveal their identity.  When all 
the time for the true insiders who knew where to look, as Orsan pointed out the 
core members had their own entry in the wiki all along.  michel playing games 
with me simply neglected to point this out.  And trifled with me yet again.  
The first trifling was not being honest with me when those in control in 
Ecuador DV BG et all were trashing my work behind my back while michel rather 
than informing of this encouraged me to finish and waste  yet more time which i 
did because ….. foolish me…. i still trusted Michel.

I was getting the p2p blog just fine until this blew open.  Kevin suggested 
feedly as an RSS mechanism and if i remember correctly feedly requires 
Facebook.  Sorry i despise Facebook and won't use it.  You are damn right folks 
there is a governance problem here.  And for me the key issue is that i find 
michel no longer trustworthy.  being told that the identity of core members is 
a secret when it in fact is NOT is not conducive to trust.  Being promise a 
full report on what happened in ecuador only to renig on that promise when BG 
goes wild is not conducive to trust.

I once had a great deal of hope for and respect of Michels work.  I have that 
no longer. why should i given his behavior this summer?

If this counts as an unacceptable attack on Michel, then you better remove me.  
You people are moving out from the sidelines into the tough political arena 
where things are gong to get nastier and from you what we have then here is a 
display worthy of school kids.

You are going to play with CIC in Spain like you played in ecuador.  But the 
playing field is occupied by individuals that appear to hate each other.  How 
is THAT going to work to build trust?  And you see that absent Michels carrying 
out his solemn promise on which he has reneged there is no way for a 
sympathetic outsider to make a judgement.

On Aug 21, 2014, at 9:21 PM, Kevin Flanagan <[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear Willi,
> 
> I do not make decisions to unsubscribe people from the list
> unilaterally. Many people have complained both publicly and privately
> about your behaviour. Personal attacks are not acceptable.
> 
> In the case of this mailing list. Where an individual is not willing to
> abide by the culture and norms of the list then s/he are welcome to
> unsubscribe and move on.
> 
> I am offering you here a opportunity to resolve this conflict.
> Here are the terms. It's really quite simple.
> 
> If in the next 24 hours from the time of this email you are willing to
> reconsider your behavior on this list, apologize for that behavior
> publicly on list and will refrain from further personal attacks in
> future. Then you are welcome to stay.
> 
> If these terms are not acceptable then I offer you 24hrs from the time
> of this email to unsubscribe. If you have not unsubscribed in that time
> I will exercise my responsibilities as list moderator and will do it for
> you.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Kevin Flanagan
> P2P Foundation Mailing List Moderator
> 
> _______________________________________________
> P2P Foundation - Mailing list
> http://www.p2pfoundation.net
> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
> 

Gordon Cook, 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618
[email protected], 1 - (609) 882-2572 - phone



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
P2P Foundation - Mailing list
http://www.p2pfoundation.net
https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation

Reply via email to