http://gurstein.wordpress.com/2014/11/06/smart-cities-vs-smart-communities-enabling-markets-or-empowering-citizens/
M From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michel Bauwens Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 4:14 AM To: p2p-foundation Subject: [P2P-F] Fwd: [P2P-URBANISM] vertical! ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Stefano Serafini <[email protected]> Date: Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 6:56 PM Subject: [P2P-URBANISM] vertical! To: p2p urbanism list <[email protected]> Dear friends, please check it out: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/rayking/vertical-city-a-solution-for-sustainable-living Sustainability and skyrocketing got married. Of course the book looks like a propaganda pamphlet, but I think we should consider this trend seriously, and not dismiss it with easy jokes. We cannot dismiss these people simply by saying that they are paid by multinational real estate companies, or that they are lobotomized and/or evil. This is not the point. Of course "urban islands" (or "continents") in the wilderness sound to me like a nightmare - especially considering all we know about neuroergonomics, biophilia, nature-deficit disorder, etc. But possibly this is were the market is leading, helped by the rethoric of "green economy" (I guess that all the industry plants will be settled on Mars, right?). The authors of the book write down: "Our team is a group of architects, entrepreneurs and visionaries who believe that Vertical Cities are a potential solution to many of humanity's greatest problems. We meet regularly in Portland, Oregon. Our Mission is to create a healthy, harmonious, sustainable and dignified life for everyone through the emerging technologies of Vertical Cities." We should analyze again the urban future these people are preparing. Why they are doing it, their reasons, their scientific and technological ground, their urban and political ideology, and the reason why things like a "Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat" exists and is funded by somebody. They look like sharing the same old dream of LeCorbusier, just on a larger scale, where "les machines-à-habiter" become whole cities instead of buildings. Possibly, they reflected about the mistakes brought in by that model, and tried to solve it by transforming cities into (huge) buildings, and buildings into cities. The main reasons for a vertical growth seem the need for setting more building-free land, in order to preserve "nature" and food production and reduce human footprint. In fact the monstruous urban growth of several metropolises since the '90s seems to substantiate such a point of view. World population is growing and it's becoming urban at a hugely accelerated pace. Are there enough data to corroborate that compact traditional-like cities are a solution out of modern horizontal sprawl? What about land-hungry Countries like Japan? All the best, Stefano Dr. Stefano Serafini Research director, International Society of Biourbanism www.biourbanism.org <http://www.biourbanism.org/> | www.biourbanistica.com <http://www.biourbanistica.com/> Managing editor, Journal of Biourbanism www.journalofbiourbanism.org Tel./fax (+39) 0695190008 - Mob. (+39) 3939426561 [email protected] Via G. Giardini, 15b - 00133 Roma | Italy -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "P2P-Urbanism" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Check out the Commons Transition Plan here at: http://en.wiki.floksociety.org/w/Research_Plan P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net Updates: http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens #82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/
_______________________________________________ P2P Foundation - Mailing list http://www.p2pfoundation.net https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
