---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Great Transition Network <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 9:37 PM
Subject: The Church of Economism and Its Discontents (GTN Discussion)
To: [email protected]



>From Michael Pirson <[email protected]>

-------------------------------------------------------
Dear All,
Dear Paul,

Thank you for starting this conversation. As I am new to the list and duly
impressed with the quality of posts and intellectual rigor presented
therein, I simply wanted to share some basic thoughts and information.

I do agree with most that has been said regarding economics and economism.
As Economics is assumption-based it resembles faith. In many ways, other
sciences operate on certain assumptions as well, consciously or not
(sociology, psychology and physics). While we sometimes call those
assumptions laws, they are more malleable than we are made to believe. The
reason why economic assumptions are so powerful, I believe, is their
simplicity and partial truth.

The ontology of the self/human as psychopathic individual accurately
describes 1-4% of the people and maybe more so those in positions of power
(those positions that social scientists tend to study). There is a
self-fulfilling prophecy at work when buying into the narrative (which I
agree most institutions largely have, including political and media
institutions).

While Richard Noorgard argues (if I understand correctly) for a new "ism"
to emerge to counter the religious power of economism, I would submit that
we may be able to build on an old "ism", namely humanism. A renewed form of
humanism which bridges the wisdom of the ancestors (say
philosophy/theology) with the insights created by science (say evolutionary
biology/neuroscience) will not be able to avoid "ontological assumptions"
about who we are as people/humans, but may be able to help transition into
a form of organizing society, economy and beyond that is more
life-conducive..

The Humanist Management Network, of which I’m a founding partner, has been
working on reconnecting the old humanistic traditions with the insights of
the sciences to provide an alternative narrative for human organizing (
www.humanetwork.org). The baseline of this group is that to counter the
power of economism, you need to have a parsimonious (simple) assumption set
of who we are as people and what we wish to organize for. We call it
“protecting human dignity and promoting well-being.” This is not new at
all, yet possibly quite relevant when examining alternative ways of
organizing (which I would submit is the crux of many problems we are
facing: poor organization).

Here is a link to a video (3 minutes) that may describe the above a bit
better:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRcBveTN1Y8

We therefore do not get rid of assumptions, but think we can better defend
those (see below)
1) we are endowed with dignity, intrinsic value
2) we do care about us and each other (otherwise we would not have survived)
3) we ultimately wish to flourish/be happy
4) we therefore intuitively understand that treating others with dignity
serves us all best (we still need to learn how: education is the humanist
theory of change)
5) and we are in pain when we destroy our life-systems.

I would argue that the notion of dignity as that which is intrinsically
valuable can be helpful. Dignity escapes the exchange and market logics and
therefore could be critical in the quest for organizing formats that
complement/supersede the market. Just a couple of ideas.

Thanks for this rich conversation and all the best,
Michael Pirson

Director for Social Innovation
Director, Center for Humanistic Management
Associate Professor, Fordham University

********************************************************************

Friday, October 30, 2015

>From Paul Raskin

-----
GTN Friends:

I write to launch our NOVEMBER DISCUSSION, which will consider Richard
Norgaard’s new GTI essay, “The Church of Economism and Its Discontents.”
Please read it at
www.greattransition.org/publication/the-church-of-economism-and-its-discontents,
and consider commenting.

Is orthodox economics akin to a secular religion? Are we living in the
“Econocene”? Is there a way out? Norgaard, a founder of ecological
economics, argues yes, yes, and maybe. In so doing, he guides us further
into the terrain of alternative economics we’ve explored recently in our
discussions of GTI pieces by Herman Daly, Giorgos Kallis, Peter Barnes, and
John Bellamy Foster.

I wonder, though:
* Is economism still a monolithic ideology? Or are critical currents within
the economics mainstream increasingly questioning its reductionist
framework and false predictions?
* As a framing for our contemporary condition, is “the Econocene” a useful
corrective to the geologic emphasis of “the Anthropocene”? How do these
compare to GTI’s term, “The Planetary Phase of Civilization,” which aims to
convey the multi-dimensionality of the globalizing social-ecological system?

I’d appreciate hearing your thoughts on these and other issues raised by
Norgaard’s stimulating essay.

Comments are welcome through NOVEMBER 30.

Looking forward,

Paul Raskin
GTI Director

NOTE ON GTI’S PUBLICATION CYCLE:
GTN discussions occur in ODD-NUMBERED months, and GTI publishes in
EVEN-NUMBERED months. Each discussion takes up a new essay or viewpoint
prior to its publication. After the discussion closes, GTI publishes the
piece, edited comments from the discussion, and a response from the author
(along with other new articles). You can review all GTN discussions at
www.greattransition.org/forum/gti-forum.

-----
Hit reply to post a message
Or see thread and reply online at
www.greattransition.org/forum/gti-discussions/171-the-church-of-economism-and-its-discontents/1410

Need help? Email [email protected]

-------------------------------------------------------
Hit reply to post a message
Or see thread and reply online at
http://www.greattransition.org/forum/gti-discussions/171-the-church-of-economism-and-its-discontents/1413

Need help? Email [email protected]





-- 
Check out the Commons Transition Plan here at: http://commonstransition.org


P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net

<http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation>Updates:
http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens

#82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/

_______________________________________________
P2P Foundation - Mailing list

Blog - http://www.blog.p2pfoundation.net
Wiki - http://www.p2pfoundation.net

Show some love and help us maintain and update our knowledge commons by making 
a donation. Thank you for your support.
https://blog.p2pfoundation.net/donation

https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation

Reply via email to