Hi Alex, Thanks. We started developing this product over 2 years ago (just a few of us) and I almost died when I saw your product (hamachi) come out shortly there after. Since you got such good traction, we decided to keep moving forward.
I have know if STUN and its variants for some time. The only reason we went with TCP initially is STUN did not work over my home firewall. Thanks, Jeff Capone -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex Pankratov Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 3:18 PM To: 'theory and practice of decentralized computer networks' Subject: RE: [p2p-hackers] A new approach to NAT/Firewall traversal > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David > Barrett > Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 1:58 PM > To: 'theory and practice of decentralized computer networks' > Subject: RE: [p2p-hackers] A new approach to NAT/Firewall traversal > > This is really cool! Jeff, I agree with David. This is indeed very cool :) I did not mean to sound all negative, just wanted to tick off few points on my standard "VPN checklist". Alex _______________________________________________ p2p-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers _______________________________________________ p2p-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
