I belive so, but let me double-check. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alexander Pevzner Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 3:59 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [p2p-hackers] Re: A new approach to NAT/Firewall traversal
Jeff Capone wrote: > Well, the last question you ask is interesting since it really depends > on the firewall pairing. Even if you have a symetic NAT with port > randomization, we will still work if the other firewall is a asymetric NAT. > The only case we theoretically fail is if one firewall does port > randomization and the other firewall is a symetric NAT with/without > port randomization. Will your technique work, if one side has a symmetric NAT with port randomization, while other side has a port-restricted cone NAT? _______________________________________________ p2p-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers _______________________________________________ p2p-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
