> > Just wondering when you do your statistics if you condition your rates on > "new" attempts. For users that it works, it will continue to work and these > users will form multiple connections and for users that is does not work, > they will not try to form more connections….basically, if you just looked at > connection formation rates it will be unfairly weighted. > Good point, Jeff!
> However, I too do believe even "new" connection rates in the 90+ > percentile is possible if you use a variety of techniques. > That's what I'd like to know if someone or a product has acchieved! Carlos ------------------------------ > > *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Alex Pankratov > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 04, 2007 10:54 AM > *To:* 'theory and practice of decentralized computer networks' > *Subject:* Re: [p2p-hackers] Effective TCP and UDP NAT Traversal (no > relaying) > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Carlos Kamienski > *Sent:* Monday, September 03, 2007 8:00 AM > *To:* theory and practice of decentralized computer networks > *Subject:* Re: [p2p-hackers] Effective TCP and UDP NAT Traversal (no > relaying) > > Hi Alex, > > I do care, but, sorry, can't share. It is not 99% though, I can tell you > this much. At some point I made a comment on this list, that 97-98% should > be achievable. Since then we added TCP NAT traversal and a handful of UDP > traversal tricks. On other hand Hamachi's userbase profile has changed. > Specifically, the percentage of home users (behind dumb routers) declined in > favor of people behind proxies and other funny devices (e.g. load > balancers). We got more people connecting from far places (hop count and > latency-wise) as well. So the number works out to be about the same as it > was before. With just the home users I suspect we would've been in 95-97% > range, though I might be off. > > > Do you mean 95-97% for both TCP and UDP? > > UDP mostly. TCP tunnels account for under 2% in our system, and the > number should be even lower if we are looking at the home users only. > > > > Alex > > _______________________________________________ > p2p-hackers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers > > -- "There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about." John von Neumann
_______________________________________________ p2p-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
