>From my knowledge you can achieve only 65-75 % effective connectivity without 
>use of port prediction algorithms. Is port prediction really some secret 
>sauce? Or is that everyone knows its bits and it is open secret!

John

----- Original Message ----
From: David Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: theory and practice of decentralized computer networks 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2007 5:21:27 PM
Subject: Re: [p2p-hackers] udp nat traversal





 
 


<!--
 _filtered {font-family:Tahoma;panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
 p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times 
New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
        {font-family:Arial;color:navy;}
 _filtered {margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
div.Section1
        {}
-->






Hi John, what’s the current state of
your NAT-penetration system?
 



My strong recommendation is to first get everything working reliably amongst
NAT pairs that don’t require port prediction (ie, everything but
symmetric/symmetric and symmetric/restricted-cone).  That alone is an
enormous amount of really exciting work.  Once you have been able to
achieve something like 90% peer connectivity with acceptable connection setup
time, then I’d ask: do you really, seriously need the remaining 10%?
 

  
 

But regardless of the answer to that
question, you shouldn’t even ask it until you’ve already got the “basics”
solidly down.
 

  
 

-david
 

  
 












From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Syzygy Dc

Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007
1:12 AM

To: [email protected]

Subject: [p2p-hackers] udp nat
traversal
 




  
 





I am implementing udp nat traversal project and need to know how to do
port prediction. Can anyone provide me links to good literature on nat
traversal and advise from anyone experienced with nat traversal?



Lots of thanks



John
 









__________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 

http://mail.yahoo.com 
 












__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers

Reply via email to