Hi, "Henry Sinnreich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is excellent. The only question I have, is why this work, just as > most of other academic work ignores the problem of most peers being > behind NAT? Beside the fact that three years were not enough to tackle every possible problem ;-), the thesis was focusing on backup in mobile ad hoc networks, where it is reasonable to assume that no NAT is involved. In fact, we had in mind single-hop communications (to avoid sending backups to physically remote locations), which is obviously NAT-free. Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ p2p-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
