>I was wondering if anyone can point me out some information about statistics about the % of >natted peers connected to P2P systems, and also possibly how many of them are full cone nats, >how many (port) restricted, how many symmetric, ...
A paper on test results for NAT types is this (not specific to p2p though) http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jennings-behave-test-results-04 Some interesting data is in these classic papers, actually the only published network data I have seen: http://www.bford.info/pub/net/p2pnat/ http://www.brynosaurus.com/pub/net/p2pnat/ Could anyone having other network based statistics share it with us? * Types of NAT encountered over the Internet (the above inquiry) * % of NAT traversal success ratio * Call setup delay for such as SIP calls using ICE Thanks, Henry On 6/19/08 9:06 AM, "Alessio Pace" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I was wondering if anyone can point me out some informations about statistics > about the % of natted peers connected to P2P systems, and also possibly how > many of them are full cone nats, how many (port) restricted, how many > symmetric, ... > > Thanks a lot in advance for any info. > > Regards, > Alessio Pace. > > _______________________________________________ > p2p-hackers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
_______________________________________________ p2p-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
