On 2008-7-10, at 22:58, ext David Barrett wrote:
> The upshot is I'm not sure that this is really a good idea.  Anybody  
> who
> installs it will be horribly slowed.  Anybody who runs a server will  
> see
> a crapload of timeouts and dead requests.  And any ISP that really  
> cares
> about observing users can still easily do so.

I concur - the design is incredible broken. I guess running a torrent  
tracker doesn't automatically turn one into a protocol designer...

And there's a boatload of existing proposals in this space. IPETEE is  
probably most closely related to anonymous TLS, and at the TCP layer  
there's draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-opt [1] (the designated successor of  
TCP-MD5) as well as the "obfuscated TCP" proposal [2]. At the IP  
layer, there is BTNS [3].

Lars

[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-opt
[2] http://code.google.com/p/obstcp/
[3] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-btns-core
_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers

Reply via email to