I agree with rejecting CFPs, they provide me with almost 0 value added. Bill
2009/3/20 Nazareno Andrade <[email protected]>: > Hi there > > I'm in favour of B. If you are really interested in being flooded by CFP, > there are plenty of lists for that. > > cheers, > Nazareno > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Boriss Mejias <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Arnaud Legout wrote: >> [...] >> > I am in favor of always rejecting CFPs, unless it is personalized to >> > this mailing list, which means >> > that unrelated or vaguely related to P2P CFPs, or simply forwarded CFPs >> > to this mailing list should >> > be rejected. >> > >> > Most of the CFPs sent to this mailing list are simply out of topic. >> > >> > How to implement that (someone needs to moderate, and that might be >> > quite some work) is another issue. >> >> having p2p-hackers-announce moves the filtering to each subscriber. I >> think >> that's the best solution. >> >> cheers >> Boriss >> >> > >> > Regards, >> > Arnaud. >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > p2p-hackers mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers >> _______________________________________________ >> p2p-hackers mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers > > > _______________________________________________ > p2p-hackers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers > > -- Bill McCormick _______________________________________________ p2p-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
