Just need a drop in replacement for TCP sockets, i.e. if I have two nodes talking over UDP, I want a simple way for them to do TCP as well.
Alex > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > David Barrett > > What about UDT? Or is there some other reason to run actual > TCP over non-IP datagrams? > > -david > > On 11/27/2010 03:54 PM, Alex Pankratov wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [email protected] > >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ian G > >> Sent: November 27, 2010 3:25 PM > >> To: theory and practice of decentralized computer networks > >> Cc: Jérôme Prudent > >> Subject: Re: [p2p-hackers] p2p-hackers Digest, Vol 51, Issue 8 > >> > >> On 28/11/10 5:38 AM, Jérôme Prudent wrote: > >>> Hi! > >>> > >>> Sorry for the off topic (and the stupidity of the > >> question), but could > >>> you briefly explain me what's wrong with the use of UDP? > >> > >> > >> Only that it isn't used enough :) > >> > >> http://iang.org/ssl/reliable_connections_are_not.html > >> > >> iang > > > > This reminds me - does anyone know of a userspace TCP > library that can > > be put on top of arbitrary datagram carrier, and not just IP? > > Clearly this can be accomplished by forking and adapting BSD (or > > license permitting - Linux) stack, but I'm looking for something > > readily available, and preferably in C. Yes, and a pony :) > > > > Alex > > > > _______________________________________________ > > p2p-hackers mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers > _______________________________________________ > p2p-hackers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers _______________________________________________ p2p-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
