On 07:00 Tue 18 Jan , Michael Blizek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 21:54 Mon 17 Jan , David Barrett wrote:
> > Here's something I wrote up a few days back that some on the list might
> > (or might not) find interesting, but I'd welcome feedback nonetheless:
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > http://blog.quinthar.com/2011/01/how-piracy-will-hyperlocalize-with-mesh.html
> >
> > While I don't think a pirate mesh is on the near horizon, I do think
> > it's entirely feasible -- and the easiest way to accelerate its arrival
> > will be to inconvenience piracy on the internet. Regardless, as a fun
> > thought exercise I imagine it'll happen like this:
>
> ...
>
> > Something like the above *will* happen. It's inevitable. It's not even
> > that creative. And it'll probably happen sooner than we expect. Sound
> > unlikely? Remember those researchers that cracked GSM at the CCC 2
> > weeks ago? They did it with "Universal Software Radio Peripheral"
>
> Sounds funny... just where did you get *that* idea from?
Thee are other projects doing this as well:
gnunet.org is building a transport as it can act as a mesh
netsukuku.freaknet.org is building a file sharing mesh network, but I doubt it
will scale very well
-Michi
--
programing a layer 3+4 network protocol for mesh networks
see http://michaelblizek.twilightparadox.com
_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
