Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 23, 2011, at 1:13 PM, David Barrett <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd say get it working with a centralized server before you even > consider making it decentralized. I think you'll find even the "easy" > centralized case is unimaginably difficult, as it relies on very precise > timing and coordination. Use a central server to get it down, and then > swap it out for a host of supernodes later. > > -david > > On 01/23/2011 09:51 AM, Valerio Schiavoni wrote: >> Hello, >> related to the recently discussed topic of nat traversal, there is the >> topic of nat discovery: >> being able to detect behind which kind of NAT a peer is sitting. >> >> Although some solutions exist, they all rely on the existence of >> servers used for this sole purpose. >> >> What are the best practices in this regard ? >> How are you currently detecting your NAT type ? >> Can it be done in a purely decentralized fashion ? Of course, we do it in RELOAD(p2psip-base) and it works very well. >> >> Thanks for any pointers, >> Valeiro >> _______________________________________________ >> p2p-hackers mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers > _______________________________________________ > p2p-hackers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers _______________________________________________ p2p-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
