> if there were a compelling enough media archive available via a peer-to-peer > system like Tahoe which enforced access to both content and storage capacity > available on a get-what you-give model, don't you think people would be > willing to make available their excess bandwidth and storage capacity in > order to gain access to it and also the ability to cryptographically store > and anonymously distribute data? yes,
i'v described a bit of my opinion here - http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/freedombox-discuss/2011-August/002497.html and in other posts there, you may try to search it there by a "FreedomBases" query. Please - participate here, mail me.. or on that topic or create your personal initiative, anyway, let's collaborate as the need is bigger than process - here. Additionally - we are evaluating http://unhosted.org/ ; http://lockerproject.org/ ; http://camlistore.org/ distributed search, computing, well - everything we could try (FLOSSly) for the conception. As you may see from FBX list -- I think it would be, particularly, great for Augmented Reality, so - there are http://www.w3.org/community/ar platform resources and there is a topic of "evaluation" in description of it. I am going to make it on http://theFNF.org hardware initiative that are actually a fboxes and frouters etc. I'v tried to make/convince it with the FBX developers themselves but it seemed like not a right place to combine it all as they are small plug Boxes, we would advance with FBX Community and all others, so there would be a great and very inspiring products i hope. I hope - This Community would help on all the process as this project is planned to be a most advanced and by that expensive among this FBXs wave. I hope we would evaluate that it is valuable enough. _______________________________________________ p2p-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
