Hello Bob,
Bob Harris wrote:
Personally, I don't get these "X is enough, no need for Y"
claims for software
I am not not talking about software, I am talking about algorithms.
I do not want to refrain anybody to implement a P2P client based on
network coding. I am simply
providing new information on the dynamics of the rarest first and choke
algorithms and I point out misunderstanding
on the dynamics of these algorithms.
If you want to implement a P2P file transfer client based on network
coding go ahead. That would be nice to have a real client
that can be experimentally compared to BT.
back. The two cases mentioned below (even though they are not
in steady state) seem like ample justification for coding.
Yes, there are tons of justifications to implement a client based on
network coding.
Regards,
Arnaud.
_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
http://zgp.org/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
_______________________________________________
Here is a web page listing P2P Conferences:
http://www.neurogrid.net/twiki/bin/view/Main/PeerToPeerConferences
