On Jan 28, 2008, at 8:01 AM, Bruce Lowekamp wrote: > But otherwise, the TURN > protocol seems to work as is. For the purposes of a TURN server, a > NAT having endpoint independent mapping seems to be the only real > requirement on the NAT
Agree on that but ... I think the hard part we have not fully solved yet is how a peer that is thinking of being a TURN server is going to detect if this is the case or not. _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
