It would also be good for people to look at Reload-et-al and see whether they have application scenarios that can't be met with this proposal.
We haven't had a meaningful discussion of the application scenarios draft, which is fine, but if there are scenarios in http://www.p2psip.org/drafts/draft-bryan-p2psip-app-scenarios-00.txt that you care about, and Reload-et-al doesn't work for them, this would be a great time to say so. For instance, I've seen postings from Dean that talked about overlays that were large enough that (1) signaling routing efficiency mattered, and (2) media path efficiency mattered. This would be a great example of something to look at in Reload-et-al, and say "no problem", or "we need to talk". The relevant scenarios are probably 4.1.1 and 4.1.2 in http://www.p2psip.org/drafts/draft-bryan-p2psip-app-scenarios-00.txt. Thanks, Spencer _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
