There are two agenda items: Open discussion of alternate protocols as alternatives to merged protocol - 20 min Open discussion of ideas from alternate protocols to be included in consensus protocol - 30 min
I understood your request to present ideas from SEP in the latter agenda item (Ideas from other protocols that should be considered for inclusion in a consensus protocol). Was that your intention? Brian > -----Original Message----- > From: Victor Pascual Ávila [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 2:30 PM > To: Henry Sinnreich > Cc: Brian Rosen; P2PSIP Mailing List > Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] Extending the (inclusive) merge for P2PSIP > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 8:06 PM, Henry Sinnreich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > We will discuss editorship with the authors of the document that is > accepted > > as a WG item > > > > Is this meant as one single document proposal (Reload), or does it > include the other proposals as well? > > Actually, authors of SEP would like to be considered at least to > discuss some distinctive features. We already requested a time slot. > > Thank you, > -- > Victor Pascual Ávila _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
