At Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:31:20 -0500, jiangxingfeng 36340 wrote: > > 7. Destination lists are underspecified, add complexity, and not > > justified for inclusion. > > > > For example, there is no text for discovering and dealing with > > loops in > > destination lists. There is no discussion about the security > > considerations of destination lists. More justification is > > needed for > > inclusion in the protocol. > > You know, the information in the via-list and destination list is about > peer-id which is often at least 128 bit long. If the message traverse 5 hops, > the messge payload will be at least 128 * 5 = 640. From my point of view, it > is a big size because it has not include any other payload. So the message > may be fragmentated with high probability.
This sounds a lot smaller when you measure it in bytes==80. -Ekr _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
