Softgear Ko wrote: > I think reload is one of best candidate as WG peer protocol. But, before we > accept reload as WG peer protocol draft, can we push Mr. Bryan to open their > implementation?
No, we can't. And we don't want in any way to make a choice based on a company's business model. > If reload is opened, we can confirm the peer protocol and find more > practical issues. It can be also very helpful to deploy our protocols to > real world quickly. I agree. But if people consider it the best candidate even without an open implementation (I do consider it the best candidate, despite being the author of an alternative proposal), there's nothing wrong with the group adopting it. -- Ciao, Enrico
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
