Now it makes sense to me. Thank you very much. Diego
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 09:42 -0400, Bruce Lowekamp wrote: > Consider the case of a person who has an office phone, cell phone, and > home-office phone. That's one person with three different devices. > Each device needs a unique peer-id (unless you want to somehow enforce > that only one device can be on at any given time). > > Bruce > > > Diego Suarez wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I have been reading the RELOAD document and I have a doubt about the > > contents of the certificates used in it (Section 3.5.1 Certificate-Based > > Security, page 21) and I would appreaciate any help in clearing me it. > > > > It is about the relationship among usernames, peer-ids and devices. > > I see useful an user can have more than one username associate with a > > peer-id in a certificate. > > I can't see why an user should need more than a peer-id in a > > certificate, apart from when different devices have to have different > > peer-id even if they belong to the same user. > > An this is what I really don't understand. why different devices should > > have different peer-ids? I mean, shouldn't we stablish relationships > > just between users and peer-ids without worrying about the device being > > used? > > > > I guess, there is a explanation for relating devices to peer-ids, but I > > can't find it. > > > > Thank you in advance. > > > > Diego > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > P2PSIP mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip > _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
