Jing Chen wrote: Hi,
(I am not an P2P-SIP expert, but here goes nothing...) > hi all, > I have a question about hip. > (1) Do we really need using HIP in P2PSIP? I mean that if we can > seperate the peerID and its location info(such as IP addr) through some > Name Services(e.g. P2PNS), do we need HIP? HIP would be useful in e.g. mobility handling in such a case (to avoid breaking phone calls when you move between networks). > (2) What's the essential benifits to introducing HIP in P2PSIP? What's > the essential differences between P2PSIP overlay nodeID and the HITs in HIP? I don't recall the details of nodeID, but perhaps answer to your question is that the HITs are hashes of public keys which makes them secure. Authenticated SIP sessions might be a cool thing to have in P2PSIP. _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
