Eric, Thanks for the clarification, and in which case issues mentioned in my first post to this thread should be considered. Although the Web archive view of that post shows it being broken up by extra email headers. Would someone please look into that?
Thank you --Michael Eric Rescorla wrote: >> 4. Either the "name<0..2^8-1>" notation is ambiguous about whether such >> leading length exist; or >> > > It's not ambiguous. It always exists. > > > -Ekr > _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
