At Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:33:55 +0800, Jing Chen wrote: > > [1 <multipart/alternative (7bit)>] > [1.1 <text/plain; UTF-8 (base64)>] > hi all, > As I know, PKI-based certificate is not flexible enough nor bandwidth > e?cient because of the size of keys and certi?cates used. Why we don't use > Identity-based security framework in RELOAD? The key management is simple in > this method. I think it fit for P2P network.
I'm not convinced this is true, but even if it is, RELOAD's design is entirely compatible with IBE/IBS: you simply treat the certificates as empty. -Ekr _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
