Hi, I read the updated draft and have some initial feedback
1. In section 5.1.3 it says " it MUST construct the destination list by reversing the order of the entries on the via list." I suggest to relax the MUST to SHOULD enabling other routing algorithms. 2. In section 5.3.2.5.1 " The ProbeReq message contains a list (potentially empty) of the pieces of status information that the requester would like the responder to provide.". What is the difference between empty list and PING request. 3. In section 5.4.2 " Three methods are defined" should be four. 4. In section 10.5 the draft suggests using probe to populate the routing table. Why probe and not Ping and if probe which information should be requested, it also relates to comment 2 about empty probe. 5. I am a bit unsure how does the destination peer know who what is the node-id of the source of a request. Thanks Roni Even _____
_______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
