At Mon, 10 Nov 2008 08:13:18 -0800, Henry Sinnreich wrote: > > Eric, > > >doesn't match common academic usage > >(or perhaps some Platonic terminology > ideal) > > We are back to a glossary of terms such as in openDHT.org > Naming the terms in those papers "platonic" is not helpful.
Neither is amorphous complaining. Are there specific terms you don't like in draft-ietf-p2psip-base. If so, why? -Ekr _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
