Saumitra, Totally agree. That and the language about requiring an overlay name to match a registered domain names are specific to a particular type of deployment. Should have that changed in the next revision, I hope.
Bruce On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 4:07 AM, Das, Saumitra <[email protected]> wrote: > The current base draft still has language about bootstrap peers being > mandated to have public IP addresses. I remember discussions earlier where > there seemed to be consensus that it should be relaxed to be reachable > addresses within the overlay deployment or language to that effect. > > This would be needed in the use cases of creating ad hoc local overlays, > enterprise overlays etc > > Thanks > Saumitra > _______________________________________________ > P2PSIP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip > _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
