I have read your article, and agree that load balancing is a key issue especially when we deploy the backend server systems built by p2p technology. Some questions following: 1)Does the finger table only include the primary virtual node ID? 2)How to change the estimated N parameter and keep the services non-stopping? Supposing that it has been far away from the actual network scale. 3)Could the imbalance factor be reduced further?
Russell Wang [email protected] 写于 2009-03-04 09:10:51: > Hi all, > > I just submitted a draft that proposes a load balancing solution for > the default DHT in RELOAD. Comments are appreciated. > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-saumitra-p2psip-loadbalance-00.txt > > Best, > Saumitra > > > > > www.saumitra.info > _______________________________________________ > P2PSIP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip -------------------------------------------------------- ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail is solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication is confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to maintain secrecy and are not permitted to disclose the contents of this communication to others. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender. This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE Anti-Spam system.
_______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
