Hi,

First, I am really glad to see a draft on the topic of *Locality* for 
RELOAD. In fact, considering localization is important for network 
operator while using p2p way.

There are some comments/doubts:

1. Why put 3.3(proposal) in the *Requirements* chapter?
And if you want giving the final solution in the same draft, I think that 
the 3.3(proposal) need enriched to be convincing. Further, I think split 
the one into two or more drafts may be better. The first one can 
concentrate on the *Requirements* and *Metrics/Measurement*. And separated 
drafts(in fact, the solution can be more than one) for proposed DHTs 
considering localization. Especially important thing is the 
*Metrics/Measurement* which is the estimator for the proposed DHTs.

2. It is better to add some early paper as reference.
As the solution in 3.3(proposal) use the well-known way of *Location-based 
Node ID*, it is better to add some early paper(which introducing such way) 
as reference.


BTW, Because *localization* is very important for QoS and operation, I 
really want to see the WG making *localization* as a research direction 
for P2PSIP.

Thanks.

Gao
 
===================================
 Zip    : 210012
 Tel    : 87211
 Tel2   :(+86)-025-52877211
 e_mail : [email protected]
===================================



"Li Gang" <[email protected]> 
发件人:  [email protected]
2009-07-13 09:47

收件人
<[email protected]>
抄送

主题
[P2PSIP] Traffic localization for RELOAD - for comments






Hi, all,
 
I submitted a draft about traffic localization for RELOAD, and the 
abstract is as follows:
Hope you can take a few minutes to look at it and let me know your 
comments J
 
Abstract:
This document describes the traffic problems due to randomly distributed 
data storage in P2PSIP overlay, identifies the traffic localization 
requirements, and then proposes an overlay construction and data storage 
mechanism to implement traffic localization for REsource LOcation And 
Discovery (RELOAD). Specifically, it's proposed to add location indicator 
to the Peer node ID, for example, the beginning 5 bit hash ID stands for 
the peer location, and user data with the location indication shall be 
possible to be stored in local peer, thus to achieve traffic localization, 
reduce backbone network traffic, and improve the efficiency and QoS of the 
whole network.
 
You can refer to the following link for more details:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-p2psip-localization-00
 
Really appreciate your comments and feedback,
 
Li Gang
China Mobile
 _______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip




--------------------------------------------------------
ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail is 
solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication is 
confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to maintain secrecy and are 
not permitted to disclose the contents of this communication to others.
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the 
message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender.
This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE Anti-Spam system.
_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip

Reply via email to