Hi,
I have read the draft, which points out the drawbacks of
draft-ietf-p2psip-sip-01. But I have some questions and confusion as
follows:
1 You mentioned the exclusivity to overlay clients, but I don't think
the draft-ietf-p2psip-sip-01 has explicitly excluded the client usage,
whereas it doesn't mention the client support explicitly. Could you show me
the apparent conflicts with the client usage in that draft?
2 I am a little confused about the description " The main difference is
that sip user registers his address while not NodeID, under his AOR"in
Section 3 "the new solution". Actually, client may have NodeID in RELOAD
protocol. In the new solution why does the sip user register with address
not NodeID? What does "address" here mean?
3 In Section 3.2.1, I am confused about the "half spending". You use ICE
offer/answer, the draft-ietf-p2psip-sip-01 uses AppAttach mechanisms, how
can you say your mechanism is "half spending"?
I would appreciate for your reply:)
Tao Ma
July 23rd
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Mobile lIfe and New
mEdia Lab
_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
