P2PSIP working group members,
At IETF 75, we were given the direction to remove the RFC 2119
language from the document and move it from being a normative doc to a
purely informational doc. I have now started this and made a number
of other changes, including most notably the name change from "p2psip-
security-requirements" to "p2psip-security-overview":
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-matuszewski-p2psip-security-overview-00.txt
Chairs, per the discussion that apparently happened at IETF75, we
would like to ask for this to be considered as a working group document.
Please note... I made a mistake in the submission process and also
submitted this as:
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-matuszewski-p2psip-security-requirements-06.txt
They are IDENTICAL except for the name change.
Thank you for your consideration,
Dan
--
Dan York, Director of Conversations
Voxeo Corporation http://www.voxeo.com [email protected]
Phone: +1-407-455-5859 Skype: danyork
Join the Voxeo conversation:
Blogs: http://blogs.voxeo.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/voxeo http://twitter.com/danyork
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/voxeo
_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
