Hi, I think this draft provides a nice summary of different load balancing models. One thing that might be good to add to the next revision is a table summarizing the pros and cons of each model. You could also consider the additional load some of the models place on a central enrollment server that may be used by the overlay (e.g., if peers need to obtain new Node-IDs to relocate themselves).
Regards, Jouni Erkki Harjula wrote: > Hi all, > > We have submitted a survey draft on different technology options for > load balancing in structured P2P networks (including P2PSIP). The draft > provides a survey of the existing and proposed load balancing > mechanisms, categorizes them into four fundamental models, and briefly > analyzes the main characteristics of each fundamental model. The goal is > to provide background information on different possible load balancing > options for P2PSIP. > > The draft can be found at > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-harjula-p2psip-loadbalancing-survey-00.txt. > Please accept our apologies for the unfinished layout (for some reason, > the submission tool did not allow us to update the draft with an > improved version). > > Comments are welcome! > > Thanks, > -Erkki > _______________________________________________ > P2PSIP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
