Cullen Jennings wrote: > I like this draft and would love to seem some experimental data from > operational networks playing with it. > > I'm not sure what anyone else things, but I think it would be worth > considering moving just one small part of to the base draft - namely > Section 5.6.1. > > On the Pro side for doing this: It's really easy to implement and it > would provide some interesting options for future things such as this > self tuning draft. > > On the Con side for doing this: in many DHT, a large percentage of > nodes leave without sending nay signaling that they are going to Leave > so specifying what goes in a Leave message might be a little optimistic
Considering also detected failures other than bye messages seems a pretty straightforward next step. I don't have an opinion whether this should be in the base specs or defined as an extension, but totally agree that a self-configuration mechanism is definitely worth having in any real DHT deployment. -- Ciao, Enrico
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
