Hi, In the current -06 draft, the second bullet of 5.1.1 states,
"If the entry is a Node-ID which belongs to this node..." A peer may be responsible for a number of Resource-IDs but one and only one Node-ID, its own. The 3rd bullet talks about routing to clients, and 5.1.3 talks about private IDs. Therefore, this 2nd bullet should only be about the top Node-ID in the destination list equals peer's own Node-ID. I suggest change the work "belongs" to "is equal", which matches the wording of the 3rd bullet. o If the entry is a Node-ID which is equal to this node, then ... Also, the first sentence of section 5.1.2 seems to refer to the 3 bullets in section 5.1.1. It that is true, then: "If neither of the other two cases applies, then ..." should be "If neither of the three cases applies, then ..." --Michael _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
