At Tue, 29 Dec 2009 09:23:45 +0800,
Sun Chongwei wrote:
> 
> [1  <text/plain; ISO-8859-1 (7bit)>]
> I do not think the argument is not worth. Many people expressed their desire
> for a opening security mechanism in RELOAD.
> Many of them agree TLS/DTLS should not be mandatory. That is an acheivement
>  of this discussion.
> 
> Am I right?

There's mandatory to implement and mandatory to use. I'm willing to
accept mandatory to implement but not to use via the mechanism I
described in my original message. I am strongly against removing the
mandatory to implement.

-Ekr
_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip

Reply via email to