fixed in next version - thanks for the careful read. On Feb 18, 2010, at 6:12 AM, neil.young wrote:
> 5.3.1.1 > > <quote> > > Thus, the 3-byte value > "Foo" would be encoded as: 03 46 4f 4f. > > </quote> > > In fact it should be "encoded" as "03 46 6f 6f", or it should be named "FOO" > :) (BTW: Those kind of errors in your draft is on the level I'm able to > discover... :)) > > Question behind: May I assume, that every "opaque" value, as far as no > explicitly determined in length, is preceded by a length byte (or more bits) > on the wire? > > Regards > > _______________________________________________ > P2PSIP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip Cullen Jennings For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
