I had thought we got rid of those since they are underapecified. If
not we should.
Ekr
On Mar 7, 2010, at 11:28, "Michael Chen" <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi,
For the base draft, at least two messages are sent without TLS/DTLS:
ATTACH and PING (multi-cast or broadcast use case). The two diagrams
in section 1.2 should reflect these two usages.
Also, to be clear and explicit, the overlay link layer should depict
the frame header and its relation to TLS/DTLS. I suggest the
following:
-------------------------------------- Overlay Link API
+------+ +------+ +------+
|<none>| |TLS | |DTLS | ...
+------+ +------+ +------+
+---------------------------------+
| Framing Header |
+---------------------------------+
The <none> box accounts for the ATTACH and PING without TLS/DTLS.
Thanks
--Michael
_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
