Hello, > That's great - thank you. The dissector has been committed to the wireshark trunk.
Stephane Bryant StonyFish, Inc > > On Sep 28, 2010, at 7:29 AM, st?phane bryant wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> We have added a ReLOAD wireshark dissector to the wireshark trunk. >> (as bug 5263: >> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5263. >> The patch can be downloaded from the bug page). >> >> St?phane Bryant >> Stonyfish, Inc. >> >> >> >> On 09/08/2010 12:15 PM, st?phane bryant wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> We are at the final stages of development for a wireshark ReLOAD >>> dissector, which we will release to the community as soon as it is >>> in a half decent shape. >>> We developed the dissector in a rather blind fashion --that is, by >>> simply following the drafts, as was pleasantly suggested in a previous >>> mail. The probability that a dissector developed that way, without >>> the use of at least a few test vectors, will actually function, is, >>> from experience, pretty close to nil: If anyone can provide us >>> with tcpdump files to test with, the help will be immensely >>> appreciated, will spare us moments of embarrassment and waste of time >>> for the unfortunate early users... >>> >>> thanks >>> St?phane Bryant >>> StonyFish, Inc. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> P2PSIP mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > P2PSIP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip > > > End of P2PSIP Digest, Vol 45, Issue 7 > ************************************* > _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
