It should be AP. You are correct however JP could have discovered the node-id of AP through many means.
On Oct 23, 2010, at 3:31 AM, Frederic-Philippe Metz <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I've got a question resp. page 123: > > The first attach in the call flow diagram states JP as the > destination. I think it should be AP ? JP has got the node-id of AP > from a previous ping, right ? If that assumption is not right, the > attach to node-id JP will fail, because 5.5.1 states that the attach > to a node-id which isn't reached will fail. > > Cheers, > Frédéric > _______________________________________________ > P2PSIP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
