I just missed it in my edit. I don't object to changing the text to make it clear.
-Ekr On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Gabriel Hege <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi, > > I haven't seen any changes concerning this 'problem' in version 12 of the > draft. > > Is this not a problem, or has it just been overlooked? > > best regards, > gabriel > > > > > > Am 16.10.2010 16:49, schrieb Gabriel Hege: > > Hi! >> >> I just stumbled accross the following sentence in section 1.3 "Security" >> in the current version of the RELOAD draft: >> Stored objects must be signed by the *storing peer*. >> >> My understanding is, that the "storing peer" is the one responsible for >> the Resource Id under which an object will be stored. >> >> So it should probably say something like: >> Stored objects must be signed by the creating peer. >> >> best regards, >> Gabriel >> >> > -- > [ Gabriel Hege http.//inet.cpt.haw-hamburg.de/members/hege ] > [ AG INET, Dept. Informatik ] > [ Hamburg University of Applied Sciences Fon: +49 40 42875-8067 ] > [ Berliner Tor 7, D-20099 Hamburg, Germany Fax: +49 40 42875-8409 ] > _______________________________________________ > P2PSIP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip >
_______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
