Sounds like a great idea, and I'm happy to get the tab. On Feb 8, 2011, at 4:04 PM, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 01/16/2011 07:18 AM, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote: >> I would be interested in doing interoperability testing with other RELOAD >> implementations (-12 and higher) at IETF 80 (we can meet in the terminal >> room, >> like we did for TURN few years ago). I am also interested to hear if there >> will >> be RELOAD implementations in SIPit 28, so I can plan my travels accordingly. > > One person was interested to do interop testing at IETF 80, but that would be > great to have more implementations, even partial, to test with. Will it > motivate implementers if I say that that I will pay a round of beer to all the > participants for each interoperability bug found in the version of p2psip-base > available at the time of the testing? - and the first round is on me anyway. > We > can make it a Bar Bof (the right kind of Bar Bof). > > - -- > Marc Petit-Huguenin > Personal email: [email protected] > Professional email: [email protected] > Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAk1RzA8ACgkQ9RoMZyVa61ebxwCgkWYwbXlqvIAZN7ZzJTWza75a > fMUAoJUPW9oLeOvkC+xm9bye5gW7vXdl > =uUuX > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > P2PSIP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
