Good catch. I will make sure a correction makes it to the RFC. The questions is which should we use. I'm proposing that we should go with TURN-SERVICE as I suspect that is what most people implemented. If anyone has an problem with that, let me know and we can sort out which to use.
On Aug 7, 2011, at 10:23 , Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > In section 8, the TURN Server usage is named "TURN-SERVICE", same thing in the > schema in section 10.1.1, but in the IANA registry in section 13.6, it is > named > "TURN_SERVICE". > > - -- > Marc Petit-Huguenin > Personal email: [email protected] > Professional email: [email protected] > Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAk4+ygwACgkQ9RoMZyVa61ej0ACdH3aSwvm19GFf13bg8qiy7+rQ > tPIAoIPMLcWX1mficujSs7swL0tAm+B3 > =uybr > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > P2PSIP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
