-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 08/25/2011 05:06 PM, Cullen Jennings wrote:
> 
> On Aug 25, 2011, at 12:15 PM, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:
> 
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>> 
>> (Sorry for the convoluted title, it seems I can no longer say
>> "Interoperability problem")
>> 
>> It is about the size of i in section 6.3.4 (and d in section 8).  I
>> remember Cullen saying that it is 4 bytes, but it seems that the spec was
>> never updated to reflect that.
> 
> Uh, I think the resolution was the other way around for one and as you say
> for the other. Let me separate the two..
> 
> First for the size of i, in section 6.3.4. The max value of this is
> controlled by the max-node-multiple values with is limited in the XML grammar
> to xsd:int. It never shows up on the wire so I think this is defined as 4
> bytes. Given the need to interate through all values up to the limit
> computing a hash each time, people will need to stick to small values.
> 
> On the other one, d in section 8, I think we decided on 8 bits was enough.
> Back in draft-ietf-p2psip-base-13 the relax NG for turn-density defined it as
> and xsd:int which did not match the unit8 in for d in section 8 but we moved
> the XML grammar to be xsd:unsignedByte  in version 14 of the draft.
> 
> So, I think we decided 4 bytes for the first and 1 byte for the second. I
> think the doc is consistent with that. Is there a part that is inconsistent
> where I need to update it.

If you are 100% sure that no implementer will ever read the spec differently
than you did here, then the doc does not need update.

- -- 
Marc Petit-Huguenin
Personal email: [email protected]
Professional email: [email protected]
Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk5X+zwACgkQ9RoMZyVa61ddYwCeMP51NflZTZOgREemAwNRGhBa
15UAn2zRo7l67j1jnhEkEWnMKwFwEFsL
=6dHy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip

Reply via email to