Hi all,

I definitely support Michaels question into the P2P group. The draft
doesn't clearly figure out how the connection "description" is
presented to the upper layers. In short terms, the reference point of
a usage using AppAttach is not defined which connection it should
expect. It may cause incompatibility if the same usage (i.e. SIP)
would expect different connection type "formats" from RELOAD.
Best Regards >>> Frédéric

On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Michael Chen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We had some discussions at the [email protected] list, and I like
> to post this question here. The base draft makes no mention of whether
> the link between two peers from an AppAttach may/should/must also
> establish D/TLS connection. Without an agreement, two peer will not be
> able to forward the actual SIP dialog traffics.
>
> This could be a big inter-op issue, so I would like the principles of
> this draft address it.
>
> Thank you
>
> --Michael
>
> _______________________________________________
> P2PSIP mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
>
_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip

Reply via email to