-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The following comments and nits from my previous review are still pending:
1. Section 3, second paragraph. To improve the reading flow of section 3 as a whole, I would suggest to replace the first sentence by this: "A P2PSIP Overlay consists of one or more nodes called Peers and may also include Clients." 2. Section 3.5 OPEN ISSUE I would suggest to move this whole section into a "Design Notes" appendix at the end of the document. See also comment 10. 3. Section 4, 2rd paragraph "SIP Redirector" I would suggest to use "SIP Redirect Server" instead, as defined in RFC 3261 Section 6. 6. Section 5: Responsible Peer I did not read all the literature on the subject, but I never saw the term "Root Peer" used as synonym for "Responsible Peer." 7. Section 6.4, second paragraph: "The P2PSIP WG..." Replace by "This document..." 8. Section 6.4, third paragraph This paragraph talks about "multicast-bootstrap", but it should also talk about unicast bootstrap (or s/multicast-bootstrap/bootstrap/) 9. Security Section Security section missing. 10. Section 7 Open Issues As an implementer that is constantly confronted to interoperability issues, I think that preserving the reasons why decisions were made is really important and should be part of each RFC as an appendix. This would prevent a lot of guessing when future implementers who never participate in the discussion will start working on this. Nits ==== - - Abstract s/mechansims/mechanisms/ An abstract should not contain references. - - Section 1. s/eselection/selection/ - - Section 3. "Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)" is already defined in Section 2, so using only "SIP" is OK. - - Section 6.1 s/resource-id/Resource-ID/ s/resource record/Resource Record/ - - Section 6.2 s/resource record/Resource Record/ On 10/31/2011 08:51 AM, [email protected] wrote: > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. This draft is a work item of the Peer-to-Peer Session Initiation > Protocol Working Group of the IETF. > > Title : Concepts and Terminology for Peer to Peer SIP > Author(s) : David A. Bryan > Philip Matthews > Eunsoo Shim > Dean Willis > Spencer Dawkins > Filename : draft-ietf-p2psip-concepts-04.txt > Pages : 20 > Date : 2011-10-31 > > This document defines concepts and terminology for the use of the > Session Initiation Protocol in a peer-to-peer environment where the > traditional proxy-registrar and message routing functions are > replaced by a distributed mechanism. These mechansims may be > implemented using a distributed hash table or other distributed data > mechanism with similar external properties. This document includes a > high-level view of the functional relationships between the network > elements defined herein, a conceptual model of operations, and an > outline of the related problems addressed by the P2PSIP working group > and the RELOAD protocol ([I-D.ietf-p2psip-base], > [I-D.ietf-p2psip-sip]) defined by the working group. > > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-p2psip-concepts-04.txt > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-p2psip-concepts-04.txt - -- Marc Petit-Huguenin Personal email: [email protected] Professional email: [email protected] Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk61abcACgkQ9RoMZyVa61fkxQCfanyJGPehH0EwAebx7HAe8XOz SCYAn3hRJrTs5dAcBPn5hvVSsQXwSk8h =SdOp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
