-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 06/15/2012 04:21 PM, Cullen Jennings wrote: > > On Jun 6, 2012, at 8:08 AM, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote: > >> It would be great also if the open issue in section 11.3 could be >> decided (password errors SHOULD be returned as 401 Unauthorized). > > that was on slide 6 of the preso at last meeting - I need to go find all > the notes but I seem to recall the decision was 401 would not be used. >
OK, so for until it is fixed, I'll return "512 Specification broken" in my implementation. - -- Marc Petit-Huguenin Email: [email protected] Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJP28//AAoJECnERZXWan7ECEsQAKJACLCL64TDMEG6fzcofp2u f4KNwxpo4eV+N1u7dV1NbAViW3NWcl33VACExrllIMPHUpTdVh3vN7sBA4ysP3iK WfasfGdPQUSJTSv266K89u6O0HOaMYcqUFOnsx/eXQs+U7b3WsHmdYsgoU4yNG2Z w+HIfUIKl39z6n0uf8NZaAzvzDtzIqkeo7HkFK85UrQh36P882aU98PR+0kRB4uU tq1tI9XDbJ55Z3STMWyRRZOMel8qhrwPuaprRVDJ91cRClxnbWngbniiwBTVHx7M +eYv+kaTKy1MOs1aBYCPhqxSjg6f5U2WvBDjhbtYDzhin2XJ7NszROgJddoleFIf ViVgrI9Lw6U7Jh8LlVVreDCRCHgXLU5xuEVSKjLO6VXs747YmU0za0fDpsvQuoqr QeF+rYn7m2XMIGPlZkeLK3aRmHJRXw3uvaNJZP+g9e8GCja4LUNQKjIf0AMoppWE 8UYkzG/rEGjBhSoOA3gZYbW3Ufvi3P7EJMfoe9Eqg+Ul3vuaAEaTVc15r3Fz6AIr KynVEls8C7ay4HWCFyWJxGkJw/pjWF1JX8RPsSmqH2v/9dOlUt9rKOn8SX86qLOl axs424UXlTAjFsNCKOJ2YFr8anbWWjOt4oSUXCGvtAcu/dcBXLvIdEVm163FC09t L8niItFNFes8rMBN3vQy =wXr3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
