Oh yeah, I meant to include this outline of the "discuss" points.
http://www.softarmor.com/dwillis/ietf/reload-base-discuss.html On Nov 6, 2012, at 3:32 PM, Dean Willis wrote: > > After integrating the outstanding consensus points into account for the -23 > draft, Marc and I spent a couple of hours looking at the various IESG input. > > It's not promising. I'm currently tracking 188 "Discuss" points. > > Some of these are simple typos. Some are requests for rewording for clarity. > One is a request to include Mary Barnes' GEN-ART review feedback, which I > haven't looked at but expect it includes a few hundred changes. > > By far the most troubling are the recurrent views that the document needs to > be re-structured for clarity, probably with a clean demarc between the base > protocol and the topology plugins like Chord. One shouldn't have to > understand Chord or even the princpals of a DHT for the base document to make > sense. > > The ADs would apparently also like to see a clean "high level" view of the > architecture and principals of operation, with dives into protocol > specification, security consideration, and OAMP. And maybe see it split into > a couple of smaller documents. > > -- > Dean _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
