Hi Gonzalo,
Thanks for point out to RFC3424.
How about adding to the following sentence an informative reference to
RFC3424. Note that appendix A is not creating an UNSAF proposal but just
mentions some methods for informational purpose.

Suggest adding to "Note that there is no foolproof way to determine if a
peer is publically reachable, other than via out-of-band  mechanisms."  to

"Note that there is no foolproof way to determine if a peer is publically
reachable, other than via out-of-band mechanisms. For discussion about
issues with address evaluation also see UNSAF [RFC3424]"

I am not sure if it adds much information but it may be good to have this
reference

Roni Even

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> Of Gonzalo Camarillo
> Sent: 17 June, 2013 3:02 PM
> To: P2PSIP Mailing List
> Subject: [P2PSIP] UNSAF considerations and draft-ietf-p2psip-drr
> 
> Folks,
> 
> Appendix A of the following draft describes how a node can obtain IP
> addresses on which it may be reached:
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-p2psip-drr-07#appendix-A
> 
> Have you taken into account the UNSAF considerations?
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3424
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Gonzalo
> _______________________________________________
> P2PSIP mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip

_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip

Reply via email to