Hi Michael, thanks for the pointer and sorry to have missed this point.
Currently I'm on travel and rather intermittently connected: We'll fix next week.
Best, Thomas On 15.07.2013 19:43, Michael Chen wrote:
Hi Thomas, The change in sip-10 is not appropriate. Please refer to my Feb 14, 2012 comment: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/p2psip/current/msg06176.html The keep-alive needed is for the application channel created from AppAttach, in this case should only carry SIP traffics. Therefore, RELOAD Ping is not appropriate. Instead, p2psip-sip should simply mention these two techniques or select one of: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5626#section-3.5 Thanks --Michael --------- Original Message --------- Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] WGLC for draft-ietf-p2psip-sip-09 From: "Thomas C. Schmidt" <[email protected]> Date: 7/15/13 12:21 am To: "Michael Chen" <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Hi Michael, all, it's updated now ... as this doc is on last call, it would be good to hear about all other comments/remarks by the Berlin meeting. Cheers, Thomas On 12.07.2013 18:32, Thomas C. Schmidt wrote: > Hi Michael, > > sorry for having missed your mail: we'll address in an update. > > Best, > > Thomas > > On 09.06.2013 17:36, Michael Chen wrote: >> Hi, >> Has the issue of keep-alive been addressed? >> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/p2psip/current/msg06176.html >> Thanks >> --Michael >>
-- Prof. Dr. Thomas C. Schmidt ° Hamburg University of Applied Sciences Berliner Tor 7 ° ° Dept. Informatik, Internet Technologies Group 20099 Hamburg, Germany ° ° http://www.haw-hamburg.de/inet Fon: +49-40-42875-8452 ° ° http://www.informatik.haw-hamburg.de/~schmidt Fax: +49-40-42875-8409 ° _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
